'Twas brillig, and David Walser at 17/06/12 20:10 did gyre and gimble: > D.Morgan wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:23 PM, David Walser <[email protected]> wrote: >>> So, if we want to follow Colin's suggestion, we drop the patch. The patch >>> changes upstream behavior, and adds the extra usage of %exclude, > which as Colin and I pointed out, you can just rm things in %install (or > patch Makefiles) instead. >> >> WE DON'T USE ANY PATCH FOR THIS AND WE USE UPSTREAM %EXCLUDE BEHAVIOUR > > No need to yell. I was misled. We just removed this patch, which made our > rpm's behavior the same as rpm5's, but not rpm.org's. Removing the > patch matches us to that upstream. Sorry for the noise :o(
Don't worry about the caps, I think the next line (which wasn't quoted) made it clear that this was a friendly shout :) If there are issues that confuse people, it's worth mentioning it, so no need to apologise for the "noise" (I certainly don't consider it noise). Cheers Col -- Colin Guthrie colin(at)mageia.org http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
