On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and David Walser at 17/06/12 20:10 did gyre and gimble: >> D.Morgan wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:23 PM, David Walser <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> So, if we want to follow Colin's suggestion, we drop the patch. The patch >>>> changes upstream behavior, and adds the extra usage of %exclude, >> which as Colin and I pointed out, you can just rm things in %install (or >> patch Makefiles) instead. >>> >>> WE DON'T USE ANY PATCH FOR THIS AND WE USE UPSTREAM %EXCLUDE BEHAVIOUR >> >> No need to yell. I was misled. We just removed this patch, which made our >> rpm's behavior the same as rpm5's, but not rpm.org's. Removing the >> patch matches us to that upstream. Sorry for the noise :o( > > Don't worry about the caps, I think the next line (which wasn't quoted) > made it clear that this was a friendly shout :) > > If there are issues that confuse people, it's worth mentioning it, so no > need to apologise for the "noise" (I certainly don't consider it noise).
of course this was friendly, this "always" is :)
