-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Il 27/06/2012 20:27, andre999 ha scritto: > By tagging the package in the name (someone suggested using "bp"), > it could be readily determined by any user that a package is a > backport. And as i told already, changing the name is not a good thing. because we need to manage the update (yes *update*) from the installed version because foo-1.0 is not upgraded by bp-foo.1.1 just because it has 1.1 into the name...
Angelo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/rWY4ACgkQqEs9DA4DquDfQwCgoCp75/nf2oDaWQ3AG8lx8s+6 44oAn3WHAqJhAPpIBYYZPWzEILidRLSJ =pZTg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
