Angelo Naselli a écrit :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Il 27/06/2012 20:27, andre999 ha scritto:
By tagging the package in the name (someone suggested using "bp"),
it could be readily determined by any user that a package is a
backport.
And as i told already, changing the name is not a good thing.
because we need to manage the update (yes *update*) from the
installed version because foo-1.0 is not upgraded by bp-foo.1.1 just
because it has 1.1 into the name...
I meant in the file name of the package, in the revision/subversion
field would be good.
Not the package name part.
Angelo
--
André
