On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > There are a couple packages left still needing the old udev library and > I'd like to get them sorted now. > > [colin@jimmy ~]$ urpmq --whatrequires lib64udev0 libudev0 > chromium-browser-unstable > chromium-browser-unstable > enna > enna > lib64udev0 > lib64zypp901 > libmyth0.24 > libudev0 > libzypp901 > > > All the libs can be ignored as they are all no longer needed, so it's > just enna and chromium-browser-unstable. > > For enna, it needs fixes for (I think) new GCC or newer libvalhalla, so > it would be great if someone could look at that. I'm not familiar with > the project, but I did find some references that it's more or less > deprecated now (Geebox seems to have switched to xbmc as it's primary > frontend: > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/geexbox-devel/VC3WFx2h9ws) > > For chromium-browser-unstable I propose we just drop it. We can keep the > -stable chromium named as it is just now although I would personally > prefer to see it just called "chromium-browser" (as no other package has > this strange naming policy and arguably many of them could if we shipped > two versions). I don't see a problem re-introducing an -unstable variant > again in the future, but unless someone is actively maintaining it it's > arguably just getting in the way. > > Thoughts? > > (CC'ed TV as he has been the most frequent committed to -unstable of late) > > Col
i will update it soon ( today i hope )
