'Twas brillig, and D.Morgan at 11/07/12 09:07 did gyre and gimble: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> There are a couple packages left still needing the old udev library and >> I'd like to get them sorted now. >> >> [colin@jimmy ~]$ urpmq --whatrequires lib64udev0 libudev0 >> chromium-browser-unstable >> chromium-browser-unstable >> enna >> enna >> lib64udev0 >> lib64zypp901 >> libmyth0.24 >> libudev0 >> libzypp901 >> >> >> All the libs can be ignored as they are all no longer needed, so it's >> just enna and chromium-browser-unstable. >> >> For enna, it needs fixes for (I think) new GCC or newer libvalhalla, so >> it would be great if someone could look at that. I'm not familiar with >> the project, but I did find some references that it's more or less >> deprecated now (Geebox seems to have switched to xbmc as it's primary >> frontend: >> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/geexbox-devel/VC3WFx2h9ws) >> >> For chromium-browser-unstable I propose we just drop it. We can keep the >> -stable chromium named as it is just now although I would personally >> prefer to see it just called "chromium-browser" (as no other package has >> this strange naming policy and arguably many of them could if we shipped >> two versions). I don't see a problem re-introducing an -unstable variant >> again in the future, but unless someone is actively maintaining it it's >> arguably just getting in the way. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> (CC'ed TV as he has been the most frequent committed to -unstable of late) >> >> Col > > i will update it soon ( today i hope )
Cool. I presume you mean the crhomium bit? What about the enna? Anyone know anything about that? Col -- Colin Guthrie colin(at)mageia.org http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
