On 10/02/2012 04:03 AM, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Given the importance of this package for several multimedia-related software (it is a mandatory dependency for cinerella, for instance), I think it's time to revisit this decision, and rather look for a pragmatic solution rather than a merely bureaucratic one.
I read the links, but I think the discussion would benefit from a statement of exactly why people don't want nonfree software in tainted.
At least for my part, I always viewed tainted as being the equivalent of PLF, i. e. we'll put this stuff in there because it's legal where we are, and you decide whether you want to mirror it and make your own decision as to whether you want to use it. I thought the whole point was to segregate tainted stuff from everything else so that mirror maintainers could avoid tainted yet still mirror the mainstream repos.
If that's true, and tainted is just a dumping ground for stuff that we have legal or philosophical problems putting anywhere else, then I don't get the free/nonfree issue.
