On 02/10/2012 12:26, Frank Griffin wrote:
At least for my part, I always viewed tainted as being the equivalent of PLF,
PLF had both free and non-free repo's.If you include both free and non-free in tainted, which is probably the "least bad" solution, then there needs to be a way for FOSS enthusiasts (who choose to do so) to avoid the non-free packages - perhaps a statement in the package description would suffice.
Jim
