11.10.2012 18:32, Barry Jackson kirjutas: > On 11/10/12 12:29, Sander Lepik wrote: >> 11.10.2012 13:58, Barry Jackson kirjutas: >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19909106 >>> >>> Maybe we should revert in Cauldron? >> Well, it's cauldron and the bug will be fixed before we get it reverted. We >> just have to >> wait a day or two. 16.0.1 candidate is already uploaded, so the bug is >> probably already >> fixed.. >> >> -- >> Sander >> >> > True - however since I use Cauldron 24/7 I have reverted to 15.0.1 and added > it to > skip.list for my own peace of mind ;) > > Barry So, instead of 1 security hole you now have 14 (most of them critical :http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html#firefox16)? ;P
Not sure if it's safer or not :) -- Sander
