Op donderdag 11 oktober 2012 19:19:33 schreef Sander Lepik: > 11.10.2012 18:32, Barry Jackson kirjutas: > > On 11/10/12 12:29, Sander Lepik wrote: > >> 11.10.2012 13:58, Barry Jackson kirjutas: > >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19909106 > >>> > >>> Maybe we should revert in Cauldron? > >> > >> Well, it's cauldron and the bug will be fixed before we get it reverted. > >> We just have to wait a day or two. 16.0.1 candidate is already uploaded, > >> so the bug is probably already fixed.. > > > > True - however since I use Cauldron 24/7 I have reverted to 15.0.1 and > > added it to skip.list for my own peace of mind ;) > > > > Barry > > So, instead of 1 security hole you now have 14 (most of them critical > > :http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html#firefox1 > :6)? ;P > Not sure if it's safer or not :) > > -- > Sander
the thing is: 1 very new one, or 14 old ones... that's the trick... 1 for which only very very recently an exploit and 14 widespread exploits
