Op woensdag 17 oktober 2012 14:09:18 schreef Colin Guthrie: > 'Twas brillig, and David Walser at 17/10/12 14:02 did gyre and gimble: > > Olav Vitters <olav@...> writes: > >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:10:35AM +0000, David Walser wrote: > >>> So if you get rid of pm-utils, what's the new alternative to the > >>> pm-suspend > >>> command if you want to suspend from the command line? > >> > >> No clue about pm-utils, but guess you're after: > >> # systemctl suspend > >> > >> see systemctl --help for various alternatives > > > > Thanks. Can this command be run as a regular user? > > Depends on policy kit policy, but it should basically respect the same > rules as other suspend operations triggered from GUIs. > > e.g. if the system is multi-seat and has other sessions active on other > seats, then it will prompt you to enter the root password, but in a > typical case where you are the only active, logged in user, then yes, it > should work fine. > > Obviously the overall system policy here is more complex than what I've > outlined above, but you get the picture. > > Col
it should actually just pop up a screen for the other sessions in which case they can "ok" the suspend/reboot, and at the same time allow for root password to force it...
