Le lundi 22 octobre 2012 01:10:59 andre999 a écrit : > Balcaen John a écrit : > > Le mardi 16 octobre 2012 01:22:39 Marek Laane a écrit : > >> As there are new groups policy, I'd propose either Graphical > >> desktop/KDE, > > > > as it is quite pure KDE application, or System/Configuration/Other, as it > > is "a tool to manage the passwords on your KDE system. By using the KDE > > wallet subsystem it not only allows you to keep your own secrets but also > > to access and manage the passwords of every application that integrates > > with the KDE wallet". Maybe really "Security" group isn't right one > > > > Well the definition of this is going to change since with « libsecret » > > supports we'll be able to « share » secrets between GNOME & KDE for > > example. > A thought ... > Is there anything now stopping us from having a package belong to more > than one group ?
No, a group is unique you can't add more than one group. > Then a package used by several desktops could appear in each. this is why we are searching for the best group. > That used to happen on release installs from iso on mdv (or maybe mdk ?) > Which I found frustrating before I realised that, since deselecting > everything in one group would deselect the packages involved from all > other groups. But it was ok once I realised what was happening. > (It would just be a good idea to warn users.) i don't understand
