Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 11:37 -0400, andre999 a écrit : > Wolfgang Bornath a écrit : > > 2010/10/24 Michael Scherer<[email protected]>: > > > >> Well, writing better description is a task that do not requires > >> technical knowledge, and that any packagers could do, if people send a > >> patch. > >> > >> Since I never received anything for my own packages for this kind of > >> problem, shall I assume that my packages are fine ? > >> > > A typical case of failed communication. It has been written many times > > that package descriptions in the installer and also some in rpmdrake > > are less than they should be. What does it tell me when I look at the > > description and all I see is "an important package you should install > > it" ? But what does it do? Brew coffee? > > > > IIRC there has been a bug report about it. Too tired now to search for > > it, sorry. > > > > Exactly. I'm getting more and more the sense that there should be a > separate bugzilla section for documentation, which would include > packaging descriptions.
Ie, a separate section ? What would it achieve that the current bugzilla system would not ? -- Michael Scherer
