Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 18:24 +0200, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit : > 2010/10/25 Michael Scherer <[email protected]>: > > Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 11:37 -0400, andre999 a écrit : > >> > >> Exactly. I'm getting more and more the sense that there should be a > >> separate bugzilla section for documentation, which would include > >> packaging descriptions. > > > > Ie, a separate section ? > > > > What would it achieve that the current bugzilla system would not ? > > I don't think it would help. There is (was) the tag "Doc" (or similar) > in Bugzilla which already marked the bug as something related to > documentation. Somebody who is concerned and ignored that would also > ignore a separate section and vice versa. > I like a more general approach involving the users and packagers likewise: > - see a lack of or bad description in the "Individual package > selection and/or rpmdrake > - report it as a bug, giving the necessary explanation (in an ideal > world offer a good description yourself) > - triage team dedicates the bug to either the packager or the > developper who inserts the description in the installer.
I would even add a tag on it, for junior job, or something like that. Ie small changes that can be done by newer packagers, just to learn how to change a package without requiring specific technical skills. -- Michael Scherer
