I read the full meeting logs from 25/10, and i noticed tmb saying: "pretty much a cooker snapshot"
I donno how far you're going to take this; but i thought we would be getting a new version out ASAP. in my understanding, we would get a 2010.1 snapshot and use it to build the first ISO. and use the cooker snapshot to get a cauldron. imo the cooker is sooo unstable and broken, we will not be able to get a working ISO from it, that is more or less stable in this timeframe. eg: * KDE * glib * perl * python * RPM * ... most of these will get fixed, in time; but what about ALL the packages depending on that? most of the packages aren't even maintained... personally, i'm against using cooker to make a stable ISO 0. rebranding a 2010.1 will be lots more stable; and maintime we will have the time to make cauldron (from cooker) into something good, so we will be able to make a release based on cauldron on the 18th of september. WDYT?
