Op dinsdag 02 november 2010 09:32:45 schreef Cazzaniga-Sandro: > On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 09:20:16AM +0100, Maarten Vanraes wrote: > > I read the full meeting logs from 25/10, and i noticed tmb saying: > > > > "pretty much a cooker snapshot" > > > > > > I donno how far you're going to take this; but i thought we would be > > getting a new version out ASAP. > > > > in my understanding, we would get a 2010.1 snapshot and use it to build > > the first ISO. > > > > and use the cooker snapshot to get a cauldron. > > > > imo the cooker is sooo unstable and broken, we will not be able to get a > > working ISO from it, that is more or less stable in this timeframe. > > > > eg: > > * KDE > > * glib > > * perl > > * python > > * RPM > > * ... > > > > most of these will get fixed, in time; but what about ALL the packages > > depending on that? most of the packages aren't even maintained... > > > > personally, i'm against using cooker to make a stable ISO 0. > > > > rebranding a 2010.1 will be lots more stable; and maintime we will have > > the time to make cauldron (from cooker) into something good, so we will > > be able to make a release based on cauldron on the 18th of september. > > > > WDYT? > > I think that in cooker, there's many bug from 2010.1 that are solved. > Software's versions are more recent too, maybe more stable. There are > bugfixes in cooker too. We can stabilize cooker a little bit more and it > will make a prety Cauldron :)
i agree, it'll make a pretty Cauldron... but not an ISO_0 in december. (imo, it will not be pretty at all) I specifically request ISO_0 to be based off 2010.1 with updates (and not cooker)
