2012/1/29 Olav Vitters <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 08:54:06PM +0100, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: >> Hopefully I have done better this time. It's not always easy to >> explain such non-technical matters to somebody who sees all things >> from a technical point of view only (we have been there, remember?). > > I have not been responding, but if you think that is how people are > responding, I suggest to re-read some of the messages.
I only meant misc with the last remark. > People have been given feedback that the setup of the poll results in it > not being useful. Various reasons for this have been given. Yes, valid reasons from their point of view and under different circumstances. Very early in the thread I wrote that this is not a professional survey with preliminary researxh, defined collection of users, etc., etc., so all those reasons which are correct in a professional environment do not apply here in the same way. > IMO, don't ask people what they want, give them what they didn't know > they wanted. Yes, from a marketing point of view of a company who produce consumer goods you are quite right. As you may have seen, there is enough room for inventions - I did not ask for favorite packages of backgrounds, I asked for features. -- wobo
