Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 14:13 +0100, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit : > 2011/2/24 Michael Scherer <[email protected]>: > > Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 16:48 +0800, Franklin Weng a écrit : > >> Hi list, > >> > >> We tested our [email protected] and it worked now. > >> > >> However, when I click "reply", I found that the reply address was set to > >> the > >> sender of the mail, not to the mailing list. > >> > >> I think it should be mailing list setting, right? Could anyone please help > >> us to take a look at it? > > > > There is some documents against this : > > > > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html > > > > who leaded to a rebuttal on : > > > > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html > > > > with then another answer : > > > > http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html > > > > And so, basically, in the end, the IETF answered about the usage of > > Reply-to:, explaining its use, and so saying this should not be used for > > forcing people to answer to the ml. > > Ok, thx for the URLs, I remember this discussions from former times. > Then, why do other lists like mageia-i18n, mageia-sysadm, mageia-dev, > and mageia-discuss do use the Reply-to setting, only the i18n-*@ lists > do not?
Not hosted on the same software. mageia-*@mageia.org is the zarb.org infrastructure, using mailman, *@ml.mageia.org is the mageia.org infrastructure, using sympa. Mailman default to changing the reply-to, sympa doesn't. -- Michael Scherer
