2011/5/27 Oliver Burger <[email protected]>: > Zé <[email protected]> schrieb am 27.05.2011 > >> I thought that the discussion i had we misc would be enough, thats > >> why i continued and commited the portuguese translation, i didnt > >> want to cause such an issue. > > But as misc told me, he asked you to discuss with Romain first. The issue > is, nobody should just change something without discussing with the people > responsible (in this case webteam) first.
First i was confused about the links, then appeared some problems regarding svn repo (but that was caused by not updating my svn local repo) and also about that pt-br would not be the most correct and that would be better if changed into pt_BR and misc said would be better to report and talk with Romain since was the person in charge for the website, in wich i said i would, and i did send this message to the i18n ML. But creating a portuguese translation and rename brasilian to pt_BR was agreed with misc, i didnt understand that it would need to be discussed first before doing any commit, else i would not do it. I knew the changes i did would need some fixes in www struture to put pt_BR working back normaly and that the pt pages could also appear thats why after i did the commit i mailed to the ML. Oliver please understand that i dont like this situation, theres no point to create frictions in the community, and ill repeat, that if i knew would need to be discussed i would have done it. > Collaboration does not mean, anybody can do whatever he wants. That's > anarchy. > > Collaboration means working in team structures with fixed responsibilities. > >> I dont understand why this is a kind of thing that would be better > >> to do after a freeze since the pt translation already exists, > >> would only force some minor changes. > > Let's see it this way. We have a working system just now. The only changes > we want to do before release is adding a few pages about the release, > changing the structure is nothing to be done easily (even though it > shouldn't be a big problem, since the existing structure is written for > being easily expanded. > >> >> So please put back the pt translation back. > >> > > >> > Maybe he can decide wether it should be put back or not since he > >> > is kinda in charge of the websites and the communication, IINM. > >> > I don't say your point is irrelevant, but it should be first > >> > discussed. You should have told us about it before changing > >> > things on the SVN. > >> > >> Yes i could had called this to be discussed but i didnt thought > >> would it be necessary, thought would be welcome and the necessary > >> steps to put it available would be easily done and would not cause > >> this kind of issue, but im still here so that i can help it what > >> is needed. > > As I said before, that's just not the way it works! You just can't change > anything about the structure of other people's / team's work, without > discussing it before. > > Doing any such changes without discussing it first and hoping those people > will eventually catch up is anarchy! > > Oliver -- Zé
