Glenn Linderman on  wrote...
| Instead of providing mailto: links, or displaying email addresses, it 
| would be better to provide a contact member form, so that members could 
| be contacted via the form, and the form internally translates that to an 
| email to the member.
| 
| Be careful not to expose the member email addresses as "hidden" input 
| forms; some early contact forms were not particularly secure.  The email 
| addresses should all be embedded in code (or database accesses) inside 
| the CGI script, not placed in .html files in any form.
| 
| Many contact form templates only support one person.
| 
| I have a Perl solution (but you mention PHP) that can support multiple 
| users, and could be hacked to do database lookups instead of embedded 
| email addresses.
| 
| For this sort of solution, you don't need ImageMagick, so replies along 
| this line are probably OT for this list; I'll try to respond 
| individually today to additional questions if you have them, while the 
| context is still in my head.  I only monitor this email address 
| sporadically, so days may go by without response, but I will be 
| monitoring it today and probably tomorrow, after that, who knows?
| 
Hiding information as a form of security has never been a good practice.
Whether it be though images, or just not handing out the information
directory or indirectly.

A good spam filter still seems to be the better solution.

I have about 13 email addresses (for various reasons) some now 15 years
old, and very well known. all forward to my normal mail address.

I am probably on every spam list, and even get spam in chinese, german,
and russian!  Viruses do not effect me as I use linux.

I use a 3 level spam filter that filters out 90% of the spam,
hmm in the last 24 hours the university wide filter took out
32 emails,   spam assain took out 10, and a personal filter (over 300
line patterns) took out 28 more.  leaving about 70 new emails in my mail
box.  30 of these were program reports 20 un-dectected spams and 20 or
so actual emails. to read or respond to.

I scan the spam, then delete. Only a few spammers I have my filter
delete outright.  I get few false spams, but not many. More un-detected.

I really have no trouble with them, other than adding a few extra rules
to my personal spam filter (a large procmail script).


  Anthony Thyssen ( System Programmer )    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Here dragon, Stupid Dragon, have a cookie...
                                   -- Visitor to Anthony's Castle
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Anthony's Home is his Castle     http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~anthony/
_______________________________________________
Magick-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users

Reply via email to