I thought so too but I was told -density. Have you tried the task to see the issue I am experiencing?
Thanks Steffan --------------------------------------------------------------- T E L 6 0 2 . 5 7 9 . 4 2 3 0 | F A X 6 0 2 . 9 7 1 . 1 6 9 4 Steffan A. Cline [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phoenix, Az http://www.ExecuChoice.net USA AIM : SteffanC ICQ : 57234309 Lasso Partner Alliance Member --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: Mikolaj Machowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: Nora > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:33:14 +0000 (UTC) > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [magick-users] Re: Proper Resampling > > Steffan A. Cline scripsit: >> I am running into an issue where images are uploaded at >> 612x403 DirectClass 210kb 0.040u 0:01 >> They are run thru -strip and -resample 72z72 but after doing so the images >> are then >> 441x290 DirectClass 142kb 0.020u 0:01 >> At this point I tried to scale the image back to where it was and it is then >> badly pixelated. It seems to me that sometime ago I saw a hint somewhere >> that mentions something crafty that needs to be done in the command. I am >> not able to find it. :( Anyone recall what I am talking about? Do I need to >> get the size and feed it back into the mogrify command? Anyone have a sample >> that I can try out? > > Shouldn't you use -density instead of -resample? > > m. > > _______________________________________________ > Magick-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
