"Steffan A. Cline" on wrote...
| I had been trying density before but this is what it says :
|
| -------------------------------------------------------
|
| The density option is an attribute and does not alter the underlying raster
| image. It may be used to adjust the rendered size for desktop publishing
| purposes by adjusting the scale applied to the pixels. To resize the image
| so that it is the same size at a different resolution, use the -resample
| option.
|
| --------------------------------------------------------
|
| I switched to -resample a couple months ago. I no longer have people using
| IE6 complaining that they cannot see the images BUT I am seeing the images
| are NOT the same size visually as the documentation says. That is where I
| come into this issue.
|
Web browsers do not look at the density or resolution of images, only
there pixel size, and displayed to fit the html document settings.
Some however stuff up when images have bad virtual canvas offsets (such
as PNG and GIF) images.
Firefox was particularly bad when a PNG had a negative offset (GIF can't
save negative offsets). I have not tried the newer Firefox for this
case.
Anthony Thyssen ( System Programmer ) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lottery(n) :- A tax on people who are bad at maths.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony's Home is his Castle http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~anthony/
_______________________________________________
Magick-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
