On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Marius Vollmer <[email protected]>wrote:
> Ethan <[email protected]> writes: > > > Further inspection revealed that the problem was that "git branch -a" > > was returning branches like this: > > > > * master > > remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master > > remotes/origin/master > > Ouch. Is there a better way to list branches? Maybe we should just > list the files in ./git/refs/{heads,remotes,tags}. > I think I understand the intent now. Yes, I think that's the right fix. But should tracking branches be treated specially? Also, I see that wazzup only shows commits in other branches that aren't in the current branch. I think it would be useful to do the reverse too -- show the commits in the current branch that aren't in the foreign branch. But I don't think magit should do this for tags. Ethan
