On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:01, Philip Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > At Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:39:35 +0000, > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > >> >> I'm using master now (at 7658b557a0fdc4ad96d4c8dfcc6d5716aebab0b4) and >> >> I don't get key-groups when I commit, and the old C-c C-s trick to do >> >> signoffs still works. >> > >> > That's expected, at the moment. The commit aspect of key groups needs >> > more work/thought. >> >> What work/thought does it need? FWIW I was fairly happy with it. > > I liked it too but --amend didn't work and people complained about the > flow. Once I get time I'll think it through again and re-implement.
Hrm, could you perhaps push the key-groups branch again as todo-merge-key-groups or something? I think all other things being sort-of-equal I'd prefer to keep using key-groups from the upstream repo since out of the features I use regularly this is the only thing that differs.
