At Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:43:25 -0900, Dave Abrahams wrote: > > Alright, and what about making 'X' context dependent instead? > > Let me see if I understand that scenario: > > `x' on a commit resets to that commit but leaves the working tree > `X' not on a commit discards the working tree > `X' on a commit discards the working tree and resets to that > commit (i.e. --hard) > > Makes perfect sense to me. I guess the obvious question is: > > `x' not on a commit does ????
I detect a smidgen of sarcasm... Personally I don't think we need a commit based hard reset. I'd say x RET X is fine for the cases you need to do one, a bit safer too. Cheers, Phil
