On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Rémi Vanicat <[email protected]> wrote:
> Philip Weaver <[email protected]> writes: > > [...] > >> > >> But in fact, the main problem I see with rewrite as it is working now in > >> head is that if I say to magit "I want to rewrite commit master~6" (that > >> is r b master~6 RET) then master~6 won't be rewrote, and this seam > strange > >> to me. I believe we should just revert the commit. If no objection, I > >> will probably do it this week-end. > >> > >> [...] > >> > > > > That is a behavior of git. > > Not exactly, it's a behavior of git rebase --interactive, but to rebase > and to rewrite is not the same. Well it used to do the same things > (rewriting history) but the used word don't mean the same things. Note > in particular that magit rewrite is wrote mainly in Emacs lisp and don't > use some magit high level tools, but only reset, log and stuff of this > level of abstraction > > Oh, I had no idea. That's a good feature to know about, thanks. > [...] > > -- > Rémi Vanicat >
