On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 21:45:20 +0200 Xavier Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TF> So I guess the problem is with M
> TF> itself.(I also tried Mozilla Mail but it does not have the problem,
> all
> TF> though I dont know if mozilla uses server or client side
> threading/sorting)
>
> How does Mozilla sort/thread the folder? Is it a local folder (in a
> file) or an IMAP one ?
I use an IMAP server (albeit, a local one).
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 21:15:21 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Finneid
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> TF> What happens is that when date sorting is turned on, some messages
> pop up at
> TF> the end of the list (descending order) that should not be there.
> They have
> TF> dates that indicate they should be some where near the top of the
> list
> TF> instead. This is further exaggerated when threading is turned on,
> since
> TF> some messages that are replies to the mis-sorted messages end up
> being
> TF> threaded in and shown at the end of the list.
>
> M-Dev is a very good example, as I have all of them (except maybe some
> spam) since a little more than one year, now. If you could give precise
> examples of the mis-behavior you observe...
List of messages at the end of the mail.
>
> TF> If I turn date sorting off, the the problem dissapears, but then I
> have to
> TF> rely on the arrival order being correct compared to the sent
> date/time.
>
> Do you think that the sorting criterion itself could be wrong?
Well, sorting by the other criteria seems to work well, and since it does
not matter whether server side sorting/threading is turned, I would guess
it is.
>
> TF> I have both turned off server threading and sorting to check if the
> server
> TF> might be the problem, but to no avail.
>
> What do you get exactly when you turn off sorting *and* threading. What
> are you looking for?
I´ve found that threading has nothing to do with the actual problem (or at
least it does´nt seem to), it just increases it.
So, sorting by date seems to be the only one that causes the problem.
If threading is turned off and sorting by date is on the all three messages
are shown after the newest messages(by date).
If threading(no matter which options are set) are on, then message 2(with
all the replies in the thread) and message 1 are shown after the newest
message. Message 3, it seems, dissapears into another thread(which should
be correct)
If sorting is turned off(arrival order is in effect) the the problem is not
visible.
I hope that clears things up a bit.
These are the messages causing problems, they end up being shown after
mail from 30th of June. This only happens when date sorting is turned on,
whether descending or ascending.
Msg 1: (Has 5 replies in a thread)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:29:10 -0600 (Central Standard Time)
From: "Robert Hood, Ph.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [M-User] customized, automated reply messages (can't see how to make a filter
do
this)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Msg 2:
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:10:07 +0900
From: ±¤°í¸¶ÄÉÆà <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [M-Dev] [±¤°íÀÔ´Ï´Ù.]À̸ÞÀÏ È«º¸µ¥ÀÌÅÍ
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Msg 3:
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:44:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michele Ravani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re[3]: [M-User] nicknames first
To: m-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Thomas Finneid
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
