On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 23:10:53 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:49:35 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Finneid > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TF> When it comes to being able to strip the image, or not, when > installing, > TF> is it customary to have the configure process decide whether the > TF> image should be stripped depending on whether -enable-debug is given > or > TF> not? To me this sounds like a much better idea, since the user > would'nt > TF> have to think of those details then. > > I don't think it is customary (i.e. I don't remember having ever seen > it), > but it seems like a good idea to me. > > TF> Any comments? > > Just one: could we please still have "install_strip" and > "install_unstrip" > targets and make install equivalent to the appropriate one depending on > the > USE_DEBUG value? Like this it would still be possible to override the > default install type if needed -- although I don't see any reason as to > why > this would be needed, it seems wiser to assume that there will be one in > the future. Sure no problem, thatīs what I was thinking anyway. Just let me find my way through the maze of configuration scripts, and Iīll see what I can do -- Thomas Finneid email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
