On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:18:24 +1000 (EST) Mark Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ML> Testing, testing, 1.2.3. ;-D ML> ML> normal ML> bold normal ML> italic normal Hmm, this is misleading: there are no starts nor underscores above, so why "bold" and "italic"? ML> normal ML> *bold words* normal ML> _italic words_ normal ML> normal ML> ML> I did myself a test as above and sent it to myself. I then displayed the ML> results of the three viewers. ML> ML> It appeas that Trivial markup is getting worse not better. I don't see any regressions... ML> Multiple words do not work under any of the filters. No. This is on purpose, if we allow spaces inside a marked up word, there are too many "false positives". It really does very strange thing to C++ code in the viewer (e.g. imagine how "int *p, *q" is going to be shown). Maybe this should be an option as not everybody probably reads C++ code in mail daily... ML> Bold works under text viewer (except it gobbles the delimiter ML> chars from single italic words). Sorry, what do you mean? I.e. an example of what does it show wrongly? ML> Is there some way that TextMarkup.cpp can be told what viewer it is being ML> attached to / used by and therefore what markups it may / may not do? This can be done but I don't think it's so useful because the viewer (a) should always be capable of showing both bold and italic and, (b) it can always add stars/underscores back itself if it can't. Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
