On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:27:28 -0400 (EDT) Richard Welty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RW> > RW> 2) it would be nice if there were a way to corpus train from RW> > RW> Message|Spam; the existing entries are for error training which RW> > RW> isn't quite the same thing. RW> RW> > No, it isn't, but is it really common to train it like this? RW> RW> if someone doesn't have a big corpus on hand, they may be stuck RW> doing it the slow way -- although admittedly, they'll probably train a lot RW> of ham from a folder, turn up dspam and start training spam using misclassified RW> materials, in which case they would use the existing buttons. This was exactly what I thought and also why I didn't add it. RW> what dialog are they in? i see file and folder, but no way to right click RW> on a spam and corpus train with it. No, these buttons are only in the spam filters options dialog. RW> > Yes, adding "clear" button to the statistics would be nice but this is RW> > really low priority to be honest... And I don't know how to do it neither RW> > to be honest (but then I didn't even look). RW> RW> i'll look into it. Thanks! RW> > RW> also, purge after training RW> > RW> completion is important, as the early databases get quite large and RW> > RW> once in production, they can be shrunk a lot. RW> RW> > It didn't shrink at all for me. But it has stopped to grow which is RW> > already nice (as it was at 55Mb). RW> RW> i may be confusing MySQL/PostgreSQL practice, since MySQL's RW> OPTIMIZE TABLE and PostgreSQL's VACUUM FULL both reclaim RW> disk space (at a cost of table locks for the duration.) In any case, it looks like it would be a really good idea to add this as most users will probably need it after this release, not the next one (when they will have already trained dspam). RW> > I'm almost surely using it incorrectly because I create and destroy RW> > DSPAM_CTX for each message. Apparently I can reuse the same one for all the RW> > messages. Also, iterating over messages is much slower than it could have RW> > been (although I suspect it doesn't play big role here). In any case, RW> > progress dialog should definitely be added... RW> RW> does libdspam require an extension to support this? i can take it up with RW> jonz I've asked him repeatedly about whether it is even legal to use dspam like this, i.e. by keeping the same DSPAM_CTX around but unfortunately have failed to get any adequate answer. It looks like I may have exhausted his patience/time limits :-( Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
