On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 01:11:12 +0200 (EET) Nerijus Baliunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
NB> On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:53:05 UT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" NB> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: NB> NB> c> I don't mean invent a new compressing method. Just use gzip or NB> bzip2. NB> c> The reason for the option is that people are too lazy to compress NB> the files and adding the option would entice them to do so. NB> NB> Makes sense IMHO. Yes, but then I would rather implement some kind of configurable pre-send processing feature, i.e. commands that can be executed on the various part of the message, such as attachments. This would allow to integrate for instance compressing, but at the same time be able to rely on the already available compression applications without having to integrate a compressing algorithm in M. This would be more flexible, IMHO michele -- Michele Ravani [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Those who live hoping, die singing" My Gran _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users Sponsored by http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
