On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 20:27:57 -0300 (ART) Leandro Lucarella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LL> NB> This is what I use. Although Vadim said background updating would not LL> NB> be so difficult to implement... LL> LL> But this doesn't means it will be implemented soon, I'm right? :\ Well, what exactly do you want to see implemented? Just running UpdateSubtree() on startup is trivial, but is this really what you want? I'm unsure about it because it may take a lot of time (just tested it: 20 seconds here). So it would probably be better to mark some files as "update on startup". Or something else entirely? Regards, VZ _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
