On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 10:54:21 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AGI> I rather like the "Re[n]: " feature, but on another list AGI> an issue of compliance arose. Thoughts? (Note the issue AGI> is compliance with the "spirit" of RFC 2822, and I'm not AGI> quite sure what to make of that.) I don't think it is in violation of the RFC but as many people seem to have an issue with it, I think we might make simple "Re:" the default -- but we'd, of course, keep "Re[n]:" option as well. Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
