On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 23:35:05 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
VZ> On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 10:54:21 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Alan G VZ> Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: VZ> VZ> AGI> I rather like the "Re[n]: " feature, but on another list VZ> AGI> an issue of compliance arose. Thoughts? (Note the issue VZ> AGI> is compliance with the "spirit" of RFC 2822, and I'm not VZ> AGI> quite sure what to make of that.) VZ> VZ> I don't think it is in violation of the RFC but as many people seem to VZ> have an issue with it, I think we might make simple "Re:" the default VZ> -- VZ> but we'd, of course, keep "Re[n]:" option as well. Seems like a good idea, as if you always use threading, the [n] (actually also the Re:) doesn't add much information. -- Michele Ravani [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Those who live hoping, die singing" My Gran ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
