On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:37:00 +1000 (EST) Mark Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ML> Palm and Python support in Mahogany at present is somewhere between "a ML> little" and none at all. AFAICT, Palm code doesn't even compile anymore. As I said, it shouldn't be difficult to fix its compilation but for this someone should be able to test it... ML> Is anyone at all using Palm or Python at all? Of course not -- as it doesn't work... Maybe someone had used them in the previous version though? ML> If we deprecate the whole lot and (in the future) bring back more uptodate ML> code, would it seriously inconvenience anyone? There is really no sense in deprecating it -- it's not compiled in anyhow. ML> At present the development team have no Palms and nobody knows Python. I do know Python but I don't have time to work on this. It would be very nice to have working Python support but it's not the highest priority for me. Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
