On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:27:21 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) BrenBarn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
B> I didn't realize I hadn't been replying to the list. I notice now B> that this list doesn't set the Reply-to header to the list address -- is B> there a reason for this? Yes, SourceForge (where this list is hosted) doesn't allow this. This is stupid from their part but OTOH because of this I had to implement a rather good (IMHO) support for replying to lists in Mahogany so it's not withotu advantages :-) B> Also, given this, is there any disadvantage to setting the "reply B> to" option to "list" rather than sender? That is, will doing this cause B> any problems for replying to mails that are not from a list? No. Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
