On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:25:20 -0600 (Mountain Daylight Time) Ed Vazquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
EV> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:47:30 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: EV> EV> > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:28:52 -0600 (Mountain Daylight Time) Ed Vazquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: EV> > EV> > EV> 1 - Be able to configure, based on Identity, where the cursor EV> > EV> and signature are placed in forwards and replies. EV> > EV> > This is currently impossible to do for the identities (although I was EV> > actually surprized to discover this -- it's a bug) [just fixed it] EV> > In particular, to do what you want, simply change the default reply EV> > template using the button at the bottom of the compose page of the folder EV> > properties dialog. EV> EV> So, if I have configured: EV> EV> $CURSOR EV> $SIGNATURE EV> EV> On $(ORIGINAL:DATE) $SENDER wrote: EV> EV> $QUOTE EV> EV> What I get is: EV> EV> On $(ORIGINAL:DATE) $SENDER wrote: EV> EV> $QUOTE EV> $SIGNATURE$CURSOR Weird. Please open a bug for this, because I don't have time to look at it now and risk forgetting about it. Please mention if you use external editor or not (I suppose no?) and if this happens for new message as well or only reply/forward. EV> That's not a bad idea, if I could get an external editor EV> configured in Win32 M. Believe me, this is possible. I used it for the last 5 years or so and am typing this in vim in fact. EV> I have tried, with varying degrees of EV> success (weird sig placement, insertion of message text in the EV> middle of a reply/forward, other oddities ad hoc. I have tried EV> ViM, UltraEdit, Notepad, SciTE, Crimson and others, all with the EV> same sort of behavior. This looks related to the above problem. The trouble is that I've never seen this happen so far. Do you use "always use it" option or start the external editor manually? EV> Well, you might not, and I consider you lucky in that regard. EV> But in my unfortunately very Microsoftish world (and I suspect EV> in other's worlds as well) it is all too common. Add to that a EV> company mandate to "overcommunicate" and I can see upwards of EV> 1000 messages a day that I have to at least glance at EV> (informational). Which means that if I set "HTML" then not only EV> do I have to deal with seeing all the incoming spam in it's EV> full-color glory, but I have to use alternate means for upwards EV> of 300 messages. Not to mention the annoyance of folks who pick EV> 6 point type (because they work in X-Ray and have 35 inch EV> radiographic monitors and 6 point look fine to them...), funky EV> script, fonts that I don't have loaded (nothing like a page of EV> "boxes" where MS couldn't find a font), flashing colors, etc. I sympathize but I really don't see what can be done about this. If the message comes in HTML and HTML only, Mahogany can only show it as HTML. What could be done is adding support for text/enriched or text/rtf or whatever else but, again, this wouldn't chaneg anything for HTML. I wonder how other people in your organization deal with this? EV> I tried a bugzilla search, but it was less than useful (returned EV> things like "This should be a priority" for "priority header"). Well, it's a plain text search after all... There shouldn't have been many matches so it is probably quite simple to glance over all of them. EV> Would this be a bug or a feature request, Enhancement but this is not really important. Some bugzilla fields curiously lack orthogonality and I never understood how were you supposed to use priority/severity anyhow. Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
