Meanwhile, on this thread, anyone object to FreeMarker as the template language?
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > If you want speed, you want a shortcut for this. > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Agree, but isn't the conclusion that the internal map returns NaN, and >> if desired, the vector converts that to 0.0? >> In my world of maps, I don't have any case where 'null' should mean '0'. >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This seems most congenial. As Jake says, 0 is definitely handier for the >>> sparse matrix/vector case and NaN is very nice for the collection case. >> >
