I don't think I know enough to comment intelligently. But I will comment anyway. :-)
I see three options, off-hand, a) velocity (the standard answer, don't know if it fits) b) freemarker (a more fashionable answer, don't know any strong reason it is better than (a)) c) something off the wall like python or groovy. Benson, Could you comment on what moves you to like option (b)? I yearn to be educated. On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>wrote: > Meanwhile, on this thread, anyone object to FreeMarker as the template > language? > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> > wrote: > > If you want speed, you want a shortcut for this. > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Agree, but isn't the conclusion that the internal map returns NaN, and > >> if desired, the vector converts that to 0.0? > >> In my world of maps, I don't have any case where 'null' should mean '0'. > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> This seems most congenial. As Jake says, 0 is definitely handier for > the > >>> sparse matrix/vector case and NaN is very nice for the collection case. > >> > > > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve
