Hey, credit where credit is due. I did \not/ do the initial
license-sorting port. I've been cleaning up and filling in after that
(aside from one little licensing problem that was not related to
LGPL). I think that Jake and Sean get the credit for the heavy
lifting.

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, as a side note to Benson -- your effort on porting these COLT
> collections is appreciated from more than one angle, regardless of the
> HPPC discussion. We have been using COLT's math/ matrix packages in C2
> and had a long-open  issue of getting rid of the LGPL parts. Solved
> now, thanks!
>
> http://issues.carrot2.org/browse/CARROT-614
>
> Dawid
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Let's do this, guys: I have finished the implementation of basic data
>> structures. I will try to merge this code with Carrot2, replacing PCJ;
>> this should give me an additional level of confidency that everything
>> is working fine. I plan to have this step done by Friday.
>>
>> Then, I will make this code available as a patch (ZIP) file on Mahout
>> JIRA for you to have a look at. I am more than fine in maintaining it
>> as part of Mahout (and reverting my active committer status), but we
>> would need to make sure it's a separate deliverable (separate JAR;
>> mahout-hppc; high performance primitive collections... or something).
>>
>> Hosting this project in Mahout will have the additional bonus of
>> polishing the API for computational code. If folks decide it can have
>> the life of its own, we can ask for a separate sub-space in the
>> commons project.
>>
>> Sounds good? I'll get back to you on Friday/Saturday.
>> Dawid
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It sure feels like it can and should be a module, which depends on no
>>>> other Mahout modules. The only barrier is someone willing to do it --
>>>> and looks like we have that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right now, mahout-math depends on no other modules, and as of last night,
>>> also does not depend on hadoop (yay!), so this should be getting easier to
>>> do.
>>>
>>> The barrier to entry as an eventual commons project is that it still has way
>>> more dependencies than typical commons projects, it looks like at first
>>> glance.
>>>
>>>  -jake
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to