Ha! In that case fanfares to all of you. D.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, credit where credit is due. I did \not/ do the initial > license-sorting port. I've been cleaning up and filling in after that > (aside from one little licensing problem that was not related to > LGPL). I think that Jake and Sean get the credit for the heavy > lifting. > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Oh, as a side note to Benson -- your effort on porting these COLT >> collections is appreciated from more than one angle, regardless of the >> HPPC discussion. We have been using COLT's math/ matrix packages in C2 >> and had a long-open issue of getting rid of the LGPL parts. Solved >> now, thanks! >> >> http://issues.carrot2.org/browse/CARROT-614 >> >> Dawid >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Let's do this, guys: I have finished the implementation of basic data >>> structures. I will try to merge this code with Carrot2, replacing PCJ; >>> this should give me an additional level of confidency that everything >>> is working fine. I plan to have this step done by Friday. >>> >>> Then, I will make this code available as a patch (ZIP) file on Mahout >>> JIRA for you to have a look at. I am more than fine in maintaining it >>> as part of Mahout (and reverting my active committer status), but we >>> would need to make sure it's a separate deliverable (separate JAR; >>> mahout-hppc; high performance primitive collections... or something). >>> >>> Hosting this project in Mahout will have the additional bonus of >>> polishing the API for computational code. If folks decide it can have >>> the life of its own, we can ask for a separate sub-space in the >>> commons project. >>> >>> Sounds good? I'll get back to you on Friday/Saturday. >>> Dawid >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It sure feels like it can and should be a module, which depends on no >>>>> other Mahout modules. The only barrier is someone willing to do it -- >>>>> and looks like we have that. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Right now, mahout-math depends on no other modules, and as of last night, >>>> also does not depend on hadoop (yay!), so this should be getting easier to >>>> do. >>>> >>>> The barrier to entry as an eventual commons project is that it still has >>>> way >>>> more dependencies than typical commons projects, it looks like at first >>>> glance. >>>> >>>> -jake >>>> >>> >> >
