How was the current hbase deployed to the apache repo under the mahout package name? I'd be happy to help get these (and a newer hadoop) rolled in, I'm just unsure of the process.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Feedback from ZK and hbase folks: > > Mahadev Konar said: > Unfortunately no.. We are planning to deploy 3.3 as the first version on > maven repo. > > StAck said: > We're working on hbase 0.21 as being the first hbase that shows up in > a maven repo. > > It looks like we are on our own. > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Farris <drew.far...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Neither hbase 0.20.2 nor zookeeper (any version) appear to be in a >> maven repo at this point, so Mahout would have to roll and deploy >> these. What was the process that was followed to build and deploy the >> mahout-packaged hadoop 0.20.1 and hbase artifacts? Is this something I >> could submit a patch to Mahout for, or better left for the committers? >> >> As Ted pointed out, yes the release of zk is 3.2.2 >> >> Drew >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:12 AM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhend...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi Drew, >> > >> > I propose to >> > 1) update hbase-0.20.0.jar to hbase-0.20.2.jar due to the later is stable >> > and hbased-platform is based on this version, >> > >> > 2) and add zookeeper-3.2.1.jar. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Zhendong >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhend...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Drew, >> >> >> >> Including a source code in snapshots that will be great. >> >> >> >> Currently, the HDFS reader does not work in 0.20.2. Without source code, >> >> it's not convenient for me to debug the code. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Zhendong >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Drew Farris <drew.far...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> I wonder if we can get the hadoop people to include source jars with >> >>> their snapshots? >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > I need a fix after 0.20.1, that's the primary reason. As a bonus, we >> >>> > don't have to maintain our own version. The downside is relying on a >> >>> > SNAPSHOT, but seems worth it to me. >> >>> > >> >>> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, zhao zhendong < >> zhaozhend...@gmail.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> Thanks Drew, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> +1 for me to maintain a stable hadoop release, such as 0.20.1. The >> >>> reason is >> >>> >> obvious :) >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Cheers, >> >>> >> Zhendong >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim) >> >> >> >> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>> >> >> >> >> Department of Computer Science >> >> School of Computing >> >> National University of Singapore >> >> >> >> >>>>>>><><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<< >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > ------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim) >> > >> > <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>> >> > >> > Department of Computer Science >> > School of Computing >> > National University of Singapore >> > >> >>>>>>>><><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<< >> > >> > > > > -- > Ted Dunning, CTO > DeepDyve >
