We put it up there. On Jan 23, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Drew Farris wrote:
> How was the current hbase deployed to the apache repo under the mahout > package name? I'd be happy to help get these (and a newer hadoop) > rolled in, I'm just unsure of the process. > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Feedback from ZK and hbase folks: >> >> Mahadev Konar said: >> Unfortunately no.. We are planning to deploy 3.3 as the first version on >> maven repo. >> >> StAck said: >> We're working on hbase 0.21 as being the first hbase that shows up in >> a maven repo. >> >> It looks like we are on our own. >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Farris <drew.far...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Neither hbase 0.20.2 nor zookeeper (any version) appear to be in a >>> maven repo at this point, so Mahout would have to roll and deploy >>> these. What was the process that was followed to build and deploy the >>> mahout-packaged hadoop 0.20.1 and hbase artifacts? Is this something I >>> could submit a patch to Mahout for, or better left for the committers? >>> >>> As Ted pointed out, yes the release of zk is 3.2.2 >>> >>> Drew >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:12 AM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhend...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Drew, >>>> >>>> I propose to >>>> 1) update hbase-0.20.0.jar to hbase-0.20.2.jar due to the later is stable >>>> and hbased-platform is based on this version, >>>> >>>> 2) and add zookeeper-3.2.1.jar. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Zhendong >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhend...@gmail.com >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Drew, >>>>> >>>>> Including a source code in snapshots that will be great. >>>>> >>>>> Currently, the HDFS reader does not work in 0.20.2. Without source code, >>>>> it's not convenient for me to debug the code. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Zhendong >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Drew Farris <drew.far...@gmail.com >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I wonder if we can get the hadoop people to include source jars with >>>>>> their snapshots? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> I need a fix after 0.20.1, that's the primary reason. As a bonus, we >>>>>>> don't have to maintain our own version. The downside is relying on a >>>>>>> SNAPSHOT, but seems worth it to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, zhao zhendong < >>> zhaozhend...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Thanks Drew, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 for me to maintain a stable hadoop release, such as 0.20.1. The >>>>>> reason is >>>>>>>> obvious :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Zhendong >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim) >>>>> >>>>> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Department of Computer Science >>>>> School of Computing >>>>> National University of Singapore >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<< >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim) >>>> >>>> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>> >>>> >>>> Department of Computer Science >>>> School of Computing >>>> National University of Singapore >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<< >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ted Dunning, CTO >> DeepDyve >> -------------------------- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com/ Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
