On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Sean <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > The number's going up again though -- I think anything created since > last week should marked 0.4 unless it's an important bug or very quick > win. > > What if I put it this way -- if I marked all open 0.3 issues as 0.4 > right now, what would the objections be? >
This is a good way to think of it, here would be my objections: MAHOUT-185 </jira/browse/MAHOUT-185>Add mahout shell script for easy launching of various algorithms </jira/browse/MAHOUT-185> MAHOUT-228 </jira/browse/MAHOUT-228>Need sequential logistic regression implementation using SGD techniques </jira/browse/MAHOUT-228> MAHOUT-180 </jira/browse/MAHOUT-180>port Hadoop-ified Lanczos SVD implementation from decomposer </jira/browse/MAHOUT-180>MAHOUT-242</jira/browse/MAHOUT-242>LLR Collocation Identifier </jira/browse/MAHOUT-242> The first two have been on the 0.3 list for a while and should go in. MAHOUT-180 I've reopened to track the fact that I've got a patch coming soon (before we cut 0.3) which puts Lanczos on Hadoop (It just needs testing). MAHOUT-242 was planned for 0.3 for ages, it just hadn't been tagged with the release properly. Other than these, I'd +1 pushing everything else out to 0.4 -jake > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yum Yum. > > > > 0.1 59 issues > > 0.2 66 issues > > 0.3 91 issues - 13 left > > >
