On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Sean <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > MAHOUT-185 </jira/browse/MAHOUT-185>Add mahout shell script for easy > > launching of various algorithms </jira/browse/MAHOUT-185> > > This one I'd disagree with, it's not a blocker in any sense, has been > on the books a while and there's not evidence of progress. Marking it > for 0.4 in no way means it won't happen, just indicates we're not > waiting another week on it. > > > MAHOUT-228 </jira/browse/MAHOUT-228>Need sequential logistic regression > > implementation using SGD techniques </jira/browse/MAHOUT-228> > > MAHOUT-180 </jira/browse/MAHOUT-180>port Hadoop-ified Lanczos SVD > > implementation from decomposer > > </jira/browse/MAHOUT-180>MAHOUT-242</jira/browse/MAHOUT-242>LLR > > Collocation Identifier </jira/browse/MAHOUT-242> > > The first two have been on the 0.3 list for a while and should go in. > > MAHOUT-180 I've reopened to track the fact that I've got a patch coming > > soon (before we cut 0.3) which puts Lanczos on Hadoop (It just needs > > testing). MAHOUT-242 was planned for 0.3 for ages, it just hadn't been > > tagged with the release properly. > > Same question I guess, who is finishing these in the next couple days? > we were supposed to be releasing 0.3 last week. > > Could I talk people into an 0.25 release? and do 0.3 in a couple weeks? > And if so could we call 0.25 0.3, and 0.3 0.4? you get my drift. >
0.2.5 you mean? otherwise we are skipping numbers :) > > We should be releasing more frequently. A call to release 0.3 isn't a > call to finish everything you want to do in the next few months, it's > a call to make sure there aren't glaring bugs or loose ends. >
