Sure, but we're not doing Avro for 0.3, so we should probably at least fix
this in some
minimal way before another release.

  -jake

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Seems like Avro is a great way to manage this enum (as in, we don't have to
> think about it).
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Drew Farris <drew.far...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 to eliminating class names in serializations (this is especially
> > bad when an efficiently managed enum can do the job)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ted Dunning, CTO
> DeepDyve
>

Reply via email to