Last question: What's the first version going to be? I propose '1.0'. 0.4 would get mighty confusion. I really don't see the harm in calling it 1.0.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Actually it seems like this a valid subproject of a Mahout TLP in its >>> own right, if that would be a useful middle-ground status. >> >> I'm not trying to suggest anything different. I'm opposed to having >> 'separate committers', but I'm happy to have multiple releasable >> components all in the Mahout TLP. > > For those following the sub project saga in Lucene, let's not go down that > road. +1 to releasable components, though. We can release what we want when > we want. It doesn't have to be the whole thing all the time. But I'd say no > to separate committers, etc.
