Hearing no other remarks, I will proceed to disconnect and make the version 1.0-SNAPSHOT, and call a release vote RSN.
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Last question: What's the first version going to be? I propose '1.0'. > 0.4 would get mighty confusion. I really don't see the harm in calling > it 1.0. > > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On Apr 3, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Actually it seems like this a valid subproject of a Mahout TLP in its >>>> own right, if that would be a useful middle-ground status. >>> >>> I'm not trying to suggest anything different. I'm opposed to having >>> 'separate committers', but I'm happy to have multiple releasable >>> components all in the Mahout TLP. >> >> For those following the sub project saga in Lucene, let's not go down that >> road. +1 to releasable components, though. We can release what we want >> when we want. It doesn't have to be the whole thing all the time. But I'd >> say no to separate committers, etc. >
