Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there anyone that is interested in keeping GUMP for JAMES running? > I see in the last years we always had hundred of recurring gump errors > for projects that are working in Hudson. > AFAICT no ASF project depends on James artifacts/gump definitions, so > can't we simply dismiss this stuff and stop receiving this build > failures if no one take care of them? (I don't even know where the > configuration for this stuff is and how to fix or remove it). > > Since 30/04/2009 this list received once a day this message and no > useful message. Serge already "complained" for this, and I'm complaining > now. > > Is anyone against disabling/removing/retiring GUMP for JAMES?
+1, disable it. Bernd
