Re: Retiring Gump? Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project james-mailet (in module james-mailet) failed

[Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini]

> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is there anyone that is interested in keeping GUMP for JAMES running?
> > I see in the last years we always had hundred of recurring gump errors
> > for projects that are working in Hudson.
> > AFAICT no ASF project depends on James artifacts/gump definitions, so
> > can't we simply dismiss this stuff and stop receiving this build
> > failures if no one take care of them? (I don't even know where the
> > configuration for this stuff is and how to fix or remove it).
> >
> > Since 30/04/2009 this list received once a day this message and no
> > useful message. Serge already "complained" for this, and I'm complaining
> > now.
> >
> > Is anyone against disabling/removing/retiring GUMP for JAMES?
>
> +1 to remove it
Vincenzo